Nevertheless many movie publishers look to use Final Cut Professional and I attended below increasing pressure from peers to move across to it. As it just happened I presently had it on the shelf as many years ago Apple stopped selling DVD Studio Professional as a stand alone program. I wanted DVD Facility Pro so I had to get the pack which happened to include FCP.
Properly, I were able to withstand creating the step until recently, when I started utilizing the new breed of tape-less cameras. My first experience was the significantly acclaimed Sony EX3, that has been used for a movie for the charity ARCOS. The only method I could get their documents into M100 was by replacing to the newest version of FCP and then using Sony’s Show Visitor and Clip Transfer software. That worked great however, for a fresh documentary generation, I’d video from the Canon XF103, another remarkably popular camera. This time around the only method I possibly could get the substance in to M100 was to import everything in to FCP first and then ship it out again - a complete waste of time. I approached M100 support and they proposed some 3rd party application which was not just quite expensive but in addition required some tortuous navigation to locate each shot within numerous folders. By this time around I was absolutely cheesed off with Press 100 and decided to offer FCP a try. final cut pro x
It absolutely was clearly a high learning bend but with the help files I could get the hold of it rather quickly. A few of the top features of FCP are a lot better than M100, its shade grading for instance, but I shortly found I had shuddered to a halt and the support files were number help. Posting documents from the Display card is quick and straightforward - all your shots is there willing to edit. But they all have 2 sound songs, actually the mute shots. Ok, no issue, in M100 you just choose the cut and switch off the trails you don’t require before hauling it to the timeline. Simple! But in FCP (I discovered by Googling the problem) you have to produce a duplicate of a clip one which just eliminate its noise songs and then only by putting it in a “collection” or timeline first and then hauling it back to the bin. It operates but it’s fiddly.
Noise pairing is a touch particular too. True, FCP provides you with smaller get a handle on but you’ve to click on the show first then adjust the degrees in the editor. Media 100 handles all of it in the schedule and is wholly instinctive - and rapidly! With Press 100 I generally edit in the schedule and I find it very surefooted and quick. You’ve a definite image of what you’ve performing with all the current songs at a view - not with FCP.
But the absolute most annoying aspect of applying FCP for me got when I put all my sequences together in a single master program. Clips that had performed perfectly in the short sequence now reported they “NEED RENDERING “.Fair enough I click Provide All. Nothing. Therefore I finally get them to provide by trial and error. But why? Just as well the customer wasn’t sitting, tapping his fingers waiting to see the very first cut. I’m positive most of the issues I’d were since I’m a novice with FCP but returning to Media 100 a short while later was natural joy!